Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807499›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Efficacy and safety of a novel ClearHemograsper for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Jin Hee Noh, Do Hoon Kim, Hee Kyong Na, Ji Yong Ahn, Jeong Hoon Lee, Kee Wook Jung, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jin Hee NohDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Do Hoon KimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. dohoon.md@gmail.com.
Hee Kyong NaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Ji Yong AhnDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Jeong Hoon LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Kee Wook JungDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Kee Don ChoiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Ho June SongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Gin Hyug LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Hwoon-Yong JungDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a widely performed procedure for the management of gastric neoplasms. Effective hemostasis during ESD is critical for procedural success and patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a newly developed hemostatic device, ClearHemograsper, in gastric ESD. Patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms between December 2022 and November 2023 were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the ClearHemograsper group or the Coagrasper group. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment outcomes. A total of 157 patients, comprising 80 patients in the ClearHemograsper group and 77 patients in the Coagrasper group, were included in the final analysis. Analyses found no statistically significant differences in the bleeding control time (3.2 ± 2.9 vs. 3.5 ± 2.7 min, 95% Confidence interval, -1.227 to 0.526; p = 0.430) and total procedure time (15.2 ± 11.8 vs. 15.5 ± 10.4 min, p = 0.846) between the groups. En bloc resection was successfully performed for all lesions in both groups. Adverse events, including early bleeding (10.0% vs. 3.9%) within 48 h post-procedure and delayed bleeding (0.0% vs. 1.3%), showed no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.211). All adverse events were effectively managed through endoscopic hemostasis. Novel ClearHemograsper demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety to Coagrasper, with preliminary evidence suggesting non-inferior or potentially superior hemostatic performance. These results demonstrate the comparable performance of domestic products in the Korean market, where overseas products occupy the majority of the device market share.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionStomach NeoplasmsAgedFemaleGastric MucosaGastroscopyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic submucosal dissectionGastric neoplasmsHemostatic Forceps

Identifiers

PMID41807499
PMCPMC13099951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.