ArticleScientific reports2026
Prediction, syntax and semantic grounding in the brain and large language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Language comprehension involves continuous anticipation of upcoming linguistic input, requiring the rapid integration of syntactic structure and semantic information. To capture the spatio-temporal dynamics of such anticipatory processes during naturalistic language comprehension, we combined electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), leveraging their complementary sensitivities and high temporal resolution. Using this combined EEG-MEG approach, we investigated word-class-specific neural responses during continuous speech perception and related these findings to word class-level predictability and representational structure in a large language model. Twenty-nine healthy participants listened to a German audio book while their neural responses were recorded. Event-related fields and event-related potentials for different word classes showed highly reproducible, characteristic spatio-temporal signatures, including significant pre-onset activity for nouns, suggesting enhanced anticipatory processing of this word class. Source-space analyses revealed activity patterns extending beyond temporal regions into areas compatible with sensorimotor cortices, suggesting a deeper semantic grounding of nouns in e.g. sensory experiences than verbs. By analyzing word class-specific predictability and representational structure in the transformer-based language model Llama, we provide a computational reference frame that complements the neural findings at the level of word classes. These findings highlight the power of simultaneous MEG-EEG recordings in unraveling the predictive, syntactic, and semantic mechanisms that underlie language comprehension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.