Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807493›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Prediction, syntax and semantic grounding in the brain and large language models.

Nikola Kölbl, Stefan Rampp, Martin Kaltenhäuser, Konstantin Tziridis, Andreas Maier, Thomas Kinfe, Ricardo Chavarriaga, Patrick Krauss, Achim Schilling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nikola KölblNeuroscience Lab, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Stefan RamppDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Martin KaltenhäuserDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Konstantin TziridisNeuroscience Lab, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas MaierPattern Recognition Lab, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Thomas KinfeMannheim Center for Neuromodulation and Neuroprosthetics (MCNN), University Hospital Mannheim, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ricardo ChavarriagaZHAW Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Patrick Krauss *Neuroscience Lab, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Achim Schilling *Neuroscience Lab, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. achim.schilling@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language comprehension involves continuous anticipation of upcoming linguistic input, requiring the rapid integration of syntactic structure and semantic information. To capture the spatio-temporal dynamics of such anticipatory processes during naturalistic language comprehension, we combined electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), leveraging their complementary sensitivities and high temporal resolution. Using this combined EEG-MEG approach, we investigated word-class-specific neural responses during continuous speech perception and related these findings to word class-level predictability and representational structure in a large language model. Twenty-nine healthy participants listened to a German audio book while their neural responses were recorded. Event-related fields and event-related potentials for different word classes showed highly reproducible, characteristic spatio-temporal signatures, including significant pre-onset activity for nouns, suggesting enhanced anticipatory processing of this word class. Source-space analyses revealed activity patterns extending beyond temporal regions into areas compatible with sensorimotor cortices, suggesting a deeper semantic grounding of nouns in e.g. sensory experiences than verbs. By analyzing word class-specific predictability and representational structure in the transformer-based language model Llama, we provide a computational reference frame that complements the neural findings at the level of word classes. These findings highlight the power of simultaneous MEG-EEG recordings in unraveling the predictive, syntactic, and semantic mechanisms that underlie language comprehension.

Indexed as

BrainComprehensionLanguageSemanticsSpeech PerceptionAdultBrain MappingElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsMagnetoencephalographyMaleYoung AdultAnticipatory activityContinuous speechEEGEmbodied cognitionMEGNatural languageSemantic grounding

Identifiers

PMID41807493
PMCPMC12979642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.