Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807430›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Distilling population specific expertise into a unified model for generalizable brain tumor segmentation.

Ahmed Elzayat, Nourhan Hanafy, Mariem Magdy, Hazem Zakaria, Mina Tayeh, Abdulkhalek Al-Fakih, Yeong Hyeon Gu, Mohammed A Al-Masni, Meena M Makary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmed Elzayat *Systems and Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nourhan Hanafy *Systems and Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mariem Magdy *Systems and Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hazem ZakariaSystems and Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mina TayehSystems and Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abdulkhalek Al-FakihDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, College of Artificial Intelligence Convergence, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yeong Hyeon GuDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, College of Artificial Intelligence Convergence, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. yhgu@sejong.ac.kr.
Mohammed A Al-Masni *Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, College of Artificial Intelligence Convergence, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. m.almasani@sejong.ac.kr.
Meena M MakarySystems and Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. MMAKARY@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

IITP (Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation) - ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) grant funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Science and ICT) IITP-2025-RS-2024-00437191National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) No. RS-2023-00243034 and No. RS-2026-25487511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal brain tumor segmentation models often struggle to generalize across diverse populations due to variations in tumor pathology, patient demographics, and imaging protocols. A common approach to mitigate these challenges involves training separate models per population, employing ensemble methods, fine-tuning pretrained networks, or adopting curriculum learning strategies. While these approaches may yield improvements within specific domains, they often suffer from limited scalability, increased inference cost, poor adaptability to heterogeneous populations, and susceptibility to overfitting or catastrophic forgetting. To address these challenges, we propose a novel Multi-Teacher Single-Student Knowledge Distillation framework (MTSS-KDNet), built on the specialized knowledge of individual teacher models and distilling their collective expertise into a unified student model. Our framework performs population-aware knowledge transfer, guiding the student to integrate the strengths of multiple specialized teachers through both latent- and output-level supervision. This enables effective and independent generalization across all tumor types. In this paper, we focus on five distinct tumor populations: Adult Gliomas, Pediatric Gliomas, Sub-Saharan African Gliomas—which, although pathologically similar to their adult counterparts, often suffer from degraded MRI image quality—Intracranial Meningiomas and Brain Metastases. These tumor types exhibit unique developmental, morphological, anatomical and imaging characteristics, introducing heterogeneity that poses significant challenges to the ability of models to generalize accurately. Our approach achieves superior performance across all five populations, with average dice scores (DSC) of 0.87, 0.84, and 0.77 in the whole tumor (WT), tumor core (TC) and enhancing tumor (ET) regions, respectively, outperforming both population-specific and strong benchmark models. These results highlight the robustness and versatility of our method, offering a promising solution for enhancing generalizability in brain tumor segmentation while facilitating seamless clinical deployment.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaImage Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain tumor segmentationFoundation modelGeneralizabilityKnowledge distillation

Identifiers

PMID41807430
PMCPMC13096204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.