ArticleNature communications2026
A paired sequence language model for protein-protein interaction modeling.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid Approach to Protein-Protein Complex Affinity Prediction Based on Language Models and Molecular Dynamics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A paired sequence language model for protein-protein interaction modeling.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is crucial for deciphering cellular processes and guiding therapeutic discovery. While recent protein language models have advanced sequence-based protein representation, most are designed for individual chains and fail to capture inherent PPI patterns. Here, we introduce a Protein Pair Language Model (PPLM) that jointly encodes paired sequences, enabling direct learning of interaction-aware representations beyond what single-chain models can provide. Building on this foundation, we develop PPLM-PPI, PPLM-Affinity, and PPLM-Contact for binary interaction, binding affinity, and interface contact prediction. Large-scale experiments show that PPLM-PPI achieves state-of-the-art performance across different species on binary interaction prediction, while PPLM-Affinity outperforms both ESM2 and structure-based methods on binding affinity modeling, particularly on challenging cases including antibody-antigen and TCR-pMHC complexes. PPLM-Contact further surpasses existing contact predictors on inter-protein contact prediction and interface residue recognition, including those deduced from cutting-edge complex structure predictions. Together, these results highlight the potential of co-represented language models to advance computational modeling of PPIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.