Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807380›Full record

ReviewNature communications2026

A cellular basis for the hourglass pattern in vertebrate embryogenesis.

Amor Damatac, Kristian K Ullrich, Alexander Klimovich, Markéta Kaucká

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amor DamatacMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Ploen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3860-4566
Kristian K UllrichMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Ploen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4308-9626
Alexander KlimovichZoological Institute, Christian Albrecht University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1764-0613
Markéta KauckáMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Ploen, Germany. kaucka@evolbio.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8781-9769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate embryogenesis follows a conserved trajectory, exhibiting divergence in early and late stages and conservation during mid-embryogenesis across species. This pattern, known as the developmental hourglass, was first described at the morphological level and later supported by molecular studies, establishing it as a hallmark of vertebrate development. The "waist" of the hourglass, representing the period most resilient to evolutionary change, coincides with the emergence of the body plan, when embryos across species appear most alike. Yet development is not simply an organism-level process; it arises from the coordinated behaviors of individual cell lineages that collectively generate form and function. If the hourglass reflects a fundamental principle of vertebrate development, might it also be rooted in the dynamics of cells themselves? In this Perspective, we revisit the hourglass model through the lens of cellular lineages, asking whether the conservation of mid-embryogenesis is underpinned by universal constraints at the level of individual cells. Could the vertebrate developmental hourglass truly have a cellular basis?

Indexed as

Body PatterningEmbryonic DevelopmentVertebratesAnimalsBiological EvolutionCell LineageGene Expression Regulation, Developmental

Identifiers

PMID41807380
PMCPMC12982620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.