ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Multimodal EEG-fNIRS classification as a clinical tool for bipolar disorder diagnosis.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a complex mood disorder characterized by recurrent depressive and manic/hypomanic episodes, accompanied by significant cognitive dysfunction and emotional dysregulation. Accurate and timely diagnosis, especially the differentiation between subtypes, remains a challenge due to overlapping symptoms, variable onset times for more specific symptoms (e.g., psychotic features), and the reliance on subjective assessments. This study examines the use of a multimodal approach combining electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to identify patterns of BD emotional dysregulation, aiming to enhance its diagnosis and subtype differentiation. The protocol employed an emotional visual task to evaluate the interference of emotional content on cognitive function. EEG data were collected using a whole-head cap, while fNIRS focused on hemodynamic changes in the frontal cortex. Furthermore, the feasibility of using a potential simplified, portable EEG-fNIRS system was explored by focusing the analysis on frontal regions. The cohort included BD patients [BP] of two main subtypes, and healthy controls [HC]. Behavioral analysis revealed significant performance differences between BP and HC groups. While EEG alone enabled groups' classification, integrating EEG and fNIRS improved accuracy by reducing misclassification rates. Although classification using only frontal EEG regions was slightly less accurate than the full-head cap, fNIRS integration ensured robust results, supporting the feasibility for a potential simplified system. These findings underscore the complementary strengths of EEG and fNIRS in capturing neural and vascular markers of emotional dysregulation in BD and support the development of multimodal diagnostic tools for BD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.