ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2026
Days at Home After Serious Health Events Among Community-Living Older Persons.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reply to: From Measuring to Protecting "Days at Home": Toward Frailty-Informed Monitoring After Serious Health Events.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDays spent at home have been identified as a clinically meaningful patient-centered outcome, especially in older persons. Serious health events in this population have pronounced deleterious effects on functional well-being. Our objective was to determine whether and how days spent at home differ in the 6 months after specific types of serious health events.
methodsFrom a prospective longitudinal study of 754 community-living persons, aged 70 years or older, we calculated the number of days at home as 180 minus the number of overnight days in a health care facility and days not alive. The occurrence of serious health events, including critical illness, major surgery (non-elective and elective), and other hospitalizations, were ascertained primarily through linkages with Medicare data.
resultsDays at home were diminished in the 180 days after each type of serious health event. Relative to a reference group, the adjusted rate ratios (95% CI), representing the mean number of days at home as a proportion, were 0.70 (0.64-0.77) for critical illness, 0.70 (0.64-0.76) for non-elective major surgery, 0.87 (0.84-0.91) for elective major surgery, and 0.86 (0.83-0.89) for other hospitalization. The corresponding absolute reductions (95% CI) in mean days at home were 48.6 (37.9-59.3), 50.1 (39.7-60.5), 20.7 (14.3-27.0), and 22.9 (17.9-28.0), respectively. Of the time not spent at home, days in a nursing facility were most common except for critical illness, which had the highest mortality; days in a hospice facility were least common; and days in a hospital differed relatively little across the groups.
conclusionDays spent at home are considerably diminished after serious health events. These findings may help guide older persons, their families, and physicians about what to expect after hospital discharge for different types of serious health events, and they suggest potential strategies that may optimize time spent at home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.