ArticleAnnals of occupational and environmental medicine2026
Case series: from ventilation failure to substitution success in occupational lead poisoning at a Korean indoor firing range.
Article in Annals of occupational and environmental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Indoor firing ranges are globally recognized as high-risk settings for occupational and recreational lead exposure due to the use of lead-based ammunition and frequently inadequate ventilation systems. In Korea, however, public health surveillance and regulatory oversight have remained limited. This case series empirically demonstrates that in high-emission settings like indoor firing ranges, ventilation upgrades are insufficient. Source substitution with lead-free primer ammunition proved to be the only definitive intervention. Case presentation: In late 2023, an index case presenting with abdominal pain was found to have a blood lead level (BLL) of 55 μg/dL, prompting a government-mandated investigation. Nine male shooting instructors (tenure: 4-65 months) were subsequently identified with BLLs ranging from 38.2-73.2 μg/dL, while airborne lead concentrations (ALC) reached 0.51 mg/m³-10 times the occupational exposure limit (OEL: 0.05 mg/m³). During a 3-month closure to upgrade ventilation, workers received chelation therapy (CaNa₂EDTA and D-penicillamine), which reduced their BLLs to 3.2-25.7 μg/dL. However, 2 months after reopening, post-intervention ALC remained elevated at 0.0797 mg/m³, still exceeding the OEL, and BLLs rebounded to 16.2-53.3 μg/dL. A substitution strategy was then implemented, replacing lead-based ammunition with copper-clad, lead-free primer rounds. This intervention decreased ALC to <0.003 mg/m³ and lowered BLLs to 4.9-23.1 μg/dL. Despite the reduced airborne concentrations, several workers continued to exhibit BLLs around 20 μg/dL, suggesting subtle ongoing exposure and mobilization of bone-stored lead. Conclusions: This cluster demonstrates that in environments where hazardous agents are continuously generated, such as indoor firing ranges, engineering controls alone, such as improved ventilation, may not provide adequate protection. Substitution-the most effective intervention within the hierarchy of controls-was essential for eliminating exposure. Furthermore, the toxicokinetics of bone lead in chronically exposed adults highlight the need for ongoing monitoring and cautious decision-making regarding treatment and return-to-work planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.