Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807260›Full record

ArticleJournal of health psychology2026

Understanding disordered eating in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A theoretical model evaluation.

Emma Reid, Melissa Oxlad, Alicia Carter, Talitha Best

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma ReidCentral Queensland University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8012-4588
Melissa OxladAdelaide University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9067-6706
Alicia CarterCentral Queensland University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6811-4512
Talitha BestCentral Queensland University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8849-1411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disordered eating is associated with negative physical and psychological outcomes for those with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), making it an important target for intervention. Theoretical modelling is recommended to inform interventions; however, it is unclear whether established disordered eating models are applicable to those with T2DM. We aimed to evaluate Stice's dual pathway model of disordered eating within a T2DM population. Participants included 192 adults living with T2DM, who completed a cross-sectional survey incorporating measures of body weight shame, dietary restraint, negative affect, binge eating and other disordered eating behaviours. Structural equation modelling was used to test the model. Results indicated that a dual pathway model demonstrated poor fit, with the restraint pathway not supported. Following removal of the restraint pathway, a revised model produced superior fit, with negative affect mediating the relationship between body weight shame and binge eating. Clinical implications for interventions and future research directions are discussed.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Feeding and Eating DisordersModels, TheoreticalAdultAgedBody ImageCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalShamebinge eatingdisordered eatingeating disorderstheoretical modeltype two diabetes

Identifiers

PMID41807260
PMCPMC13683922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.