Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807110›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2026

The other giant: functional significance and divergence of Type I MADS-box genes in the evolution of land plants.

Yichun Qiu, Claudia Köhler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yichun QiuDepartment of Plant Reproductive Biology and Epigenetics, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam 14476, Germany.
Claudia KöhlerDepartment of Plant Reproductive Biology and Epigenetics, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam 14476, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2619-4857

Funding

Max Planck Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiosperms represent the most abundant and diverse lineage of land plants, and their evolutionary success is closely linked to major reproductive innovations, including the origin of flowers and the embryo-nourishing endosperm. Many of the genes underlying these innovations belong to the MADS-box transcription factor family. While the functions of MIKCC-type MADS-box genes in floral development are well established, this review focuses on the other two lineages, M-type and MIKC*-type genes, and synthesizes recent advances in the understanding of their functional roles and evolutionary histories. M-type genes are key regulators of female gametophyte and endosperm development, indicating that two hallmark features of angiosperms were promoted by distinct MADS-box gene classes. MIKC*-type genes govern pollen development and are phylogenetically more closely related to M-type genes; together, they form the plant-specific Type I clade, which primarily regulates gametophytic programmes. This contrasts with the Type II clade, comprising MIKCC-type genes that diversified to control sporophytic development. Both Type I and Type II clades originated from plant-specific duplications of ancestral MEF2-like genes. Through extensive lineage-specific expansion and diversification, these MADS-box transcription factors have played a central role in plant terrestrialization by integrating stress responses with reproductive development and the patterning of progressively complex body plans.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEmbryophytaEvolution, MolecularMADS Domain ProteinsMagnoliopsidaPlant ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantPhylogenyMADS Domain ProteinsPlant ProteinsEndospermevo-devogametophytegene duplicationland plantMADS-box transcription factorMIKC*-typeM-typeType I

Identifiers

PMID41807110
PMCPMC13293092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.