ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
The Utility and Robustness of Sentence Repetition as a Marker of Developmental Language Disorder: An Analysis of the Surrey Communication and Language in Education Study Project Data.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study examined the diagnostic power and robustness of sentence repetition (SR) in distinguishing monolingual English-speaking children with developmental language disorder (DLD) from typically developing (TD) children, using a large-scale secondary analysis of the Surrey Communication and Language in Education Study data set. We evaluated SR's effectiveness across different scoring methods in age-matched groups across three different time points.
methodA total of 407 children were included. Bayesian beta regression models compared SR performance between groups across four scoring methods. SR's diagnostic accuracy was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios.
resultsChildren with DLD consistently performed less accurately than TD peers on SR tasks, with differences persisting across ages 5-11 years and across all scoring methods. AUC values indicated good to excellent discriminative ability, especially in younger groups, though sensitivity and specificity fell below clinical thresholds.
conclusionsThese findings support SR's diagnostic potential as a reliable language measure. SR may serve as a valuable tool due to its ease of use and scoring flexibility, though additional assessments are recommended for comprehensive language evaluation. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.31431517.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.