ArticleBMJ open2026
Annual Patient EXposure of residents in training over 20 years (APEX-trial): a retrospective analysis from a public teaching hospital.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the clinical patient exposure of residents over 20 years following the statutory introduction of a maximum working week of 50 hours in 2005.
designRetrospective analysis of longitudinal cohorts of residents who worked on the medical wards between 2001 and 2023 or the emergency department (ED) between 2007 and 2023.
settingCantonal Hospital of Baden, a representative, large Swiss teaching hospital affiliated with the University Hospital of Zurich.
participantsResidents in training working on the internal medical wards and the ED. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual Patient Exposure (APEX) of residents, which is the ratio of annual patients to residents and describes the annual number of patients treated per resident. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We assessed time trends of the APEX in annual cohorts of residents in training on the internal medicine wards (2001-2023) and the ED (2007-2023). We analysed the annual case severity (Case Mix Index and Emergency Severity Index (ESI)), patient age and the length of hospital stay (LOS) as a proxy for changes in the patient population over time and the readmission rate as a quality indicator.
resultsThe medical ward APEX even increased by 5.2% from 325 patients to 342, despite the workhour restrictions and the increased number of residents (+90%). Inpatients increased by 100% (from 3250 to 6507). Their LOS decreased from 12.4 to 7.5 days and the readmission rate decreased from 4.2% to 3.3%.In the ED, the APEX decreased by 21% (from 3261 to 2576), but the case complexity (ESI) and the LOS increased substantially.
conclusionsIn contrast to the general belief, work hour restrictions and the increased number of residents did not reduce the inpatient APEX over 20 years. The reduced APEX in the ED may be compensated by the increase in case complexity and the LOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.