ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2026
Long-wave infrared imaging for respiratory rate measurement in a patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A case report.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory monitoring is important in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients as progressive respiratory muscle weakness often leads to respiratory failure. We performed single-case feasibility evaluation of long-wave infrared imaging for noncontact respiratory rate estimation in a hospitalized amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patient and compared it with red-green-blue camera-based optical flow analysis and electrocardiogram-derived respiration. Respiratory rate was assessed using four methods: (a) manual counting as the ground truth; (b) long-wave infrared; (c) red-green-blue; and (d) single-lead electrocardiogram under three lighting conditions (regular, dim, and dark) with three 1-min trials per condition. Estimation accuracy was evaluated using mean absolute error relative to manual counting. Long-wave infrared imaging demonstrated the highest accuracy across all lighting conditions, with mean absolute errors of 1.67, 0.33, and 2.33 breaths per min, respectively. Red-green-blue-based estimation performed moderately well under regular and dim lighting but showed reduced accuracy in darkness, including one failed trial. Electrocardiogram-derived respiration showed the lowest accuracy and greatest variability across conditions. The limitations of the present study include its single-case design and absence of objective flow-based respiratory reference signals. However, this study demonstrates the feasibility and illumination robustness of long-wave infrared-based noncontact respiratory rate estimation in a hospital environment and supports further investigation of this approach for respiratory monitoring in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.