ArticleWorld journal of surgery2026
Mapping of Preoperative Screening Tools Reveals Urgent Need for Standardization in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Scoping Review.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- ASO Author Reflections: The Right Care, for the Right Patient, at the Right Time: Development of the PREdiCT Screening Tool for Prehabilitation in Cancer Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a major global health challenge due to their high incidence, mortality, and surgical complication rates. Preoperative physical, nutritional, and psychological vulnerabilities increase the risk of adverse surgical outcomes. Despite this, there is currently no validated, self-report screening tool integrating assessment across all three domains. This scoping review aims to identify and describe existing preoperative screening tools used to assess modifiable physical, nutritional, and psychological domains in adult patients undergoing elective GI cancer surgery.
methodsWe conducted this scoping review in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed across MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, EBM, and PsycINFO date limited from January 2000 to March 2025. Studies were included if they evaluated preoperative screening tools for physical, nutritional, and/or psychological assessment in adult patients undergoing GI cancer surgery. Data on tool characteristics, domains assessed, administration time, and psychometric properties were extracted and synthesized descriptively.
resultsFrom 2825 initial records, 121 studies were included, encompassing 77 unique screening tools. These were categorized as physical (n = 21), nutritional (n = 16), and psychological (n = 40) tools. Most tools were brief (1-15 items).
conclusionsAlthough most screening tools are brief, feasible for self-administration, and freely accessible, none integrated all three domains. Substantial heterogeneity in tools highlights the need for a comprehensive, validated multidomain preoperative screening tool for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.