ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2026
Social inequalities in cancer in Germany: a call to action.
Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic differences in return to work after oncological rehabilitation: An analysis using data from German Pension Insurance.Journal of health monitoring · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial inequalities in cancer constitute a major public health challenge. A lower socioeconomic position (SEP) is consistently associated with higher exposure to cancer risk factors, lower participation in screening, more advanced stage at diagnosis, poorer survival, and adverse survivorship outcomes. In Germany, these inequalities remain insufficiently addressed in research and health policy.
methodsThis paper synthesises evidence and expert perspectives derived from a national workshop organised by the Cancer Epidemiology Working Group of the German Society for Epidemiology (DGEpi) in collaboration with the German Cancer Research Center. More than 30 experts in cancer epidemiology and social inequality research, together with international contributors, reviewed-based on existing conceptual frameworks-the German data landscape, and empirical evidence across the cancer continuum. Structural, methodological, and ethical barriers were identified, and implications for research, policy, and practice were discussed. An international comparison with Denmark was used to contextualise findings.
resultsAvailable evidence demonstrates pronounced socioeconomic inequalities across nearly all stages of the cancer continuum in Germany, including prevention, screening, incidence, diagnosis, survival, and survivorship. However, major research gaps persist. Key barriers include limited availability of individual-level SEP data, reliance on area-based deprivation indices, restricted data linkage, fragmented healthcare structures, and limited integration of equity considerations into national cancer strategies. International experience shows that comprehensive registries, data linkage, and targeted interventions can reduce inequalities.
conclusionsReducing social inequalities in cancer in Germany requires coordinated and evidence-based action. Priorities include improving SEP data availability and linkage, embedding equity objectives into the National Cancer Plan, implementing targeted interventions for vulnerable groups, and strengthening intersectoral collaboration. Ethical and patient perspectives strongly support responsible use of health data to address avoidable inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.