ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Duct to duct biliary reconstruction during major hepatectomy with limited resection of the biliary confluence.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In major hepatectomies, biliary reconstruction may be necessary due to oncological reasons or intraoperative events. Duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction (DDBR) may be an alternative to the classical Roux-en-Y bilioenteric (RYBE) anastomosis in well selected cases. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of DDBR in our institution. Between 2014 and 2023, 14 patients underwent major hepato-biliary resection with subsequent DDBR. Ten were planned preoperatively and classified as intentional and 4 were dictated by intraoperative events and classified as non-intentional. Bile leak occurred in a single patient (7%), requiring reoperation for biliary peritonitis. Five patients (36%) developed intra-abdominal collections, including three abscesses and two bilomas that required percutaneous drainage. During these procedures, routine cholangiography was performed through the trans-anastomotic drain placed at the initial surgery. In all five patients, no anastomotic leakage was demonstrated, indicating that the collections originated from the transection margin of the liver rather than the anastomosis. Clinically relevant anastomotic stricture occurred in four patients (28.5%): three (75%) were successfully managed endoscopically, while one (25%) required conversion to RYBE. An additional patient was diagnosed with a stricture on follow-up imaging without biochemical or clinical consequences and was managed conservatively. DDBR, when performed under optimal conditions, yields satisfactory functional outcomes and long-term results. The ability to manage complications effectively further supports DDBR as a viable reconstructive technique in major hepatectomy in well selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41806170What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.