Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41806166›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026

Learning Covariate Relations in Disease Progression Models Using Symbolic Neural Networks.

Jesper Sundell, Ylva Wahlquist, Maria C Kjellsson, Mats O Karlsson, Kristian Soltesz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jesper SundellDepartment of Automatic Control, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5395-9819
Ylva WahlquistDepartment of Automatic Control, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7265-5012
Maria C KjellssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3531-9452
Mats O KarlssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1258-8297
Kristian SolteszDepartment of Automatic Control, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6378-7646

Funding

Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation KAW 2020.0239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covariate modeling provides individual predictions of outcomes by disease progression models. Current methodology for mapping covariates onto model parameters is limited by predefined parametric functions which can result in inadequate covariate selection and biased predictions by the final model. Furthermore, present methodology scales poorly to high-dimensional data due to combinatorial limitations. In the present study, a novel method for automation of covariate model identification in disease progression models is described. Symbolic neural networks are used to simultaneously identify the parametric covariate functions and optimize model parameters of a Markov chain. By stepwise pruning of initially fully connected dense symbolic networks, humanly readable functions representing the covariate relations are produced. The presented methodology is applied to a dataset containing disease progression observations for type 2 diabetes patients. Although utilizing fewer covariates, the resulting model demonstrates predictive performance similar to that of a model which was developed on the same data using state-of-the-art modeling methodology.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Neural Networks, ComputerDisease ProgressionHumansMarkov ChainsPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning Modelsdiabetesmachine learningMarkov modelsneural networkspharmacometrics

Identifiers

PMID41806166
PMCPMC13014801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.