ArticleInternational microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology2026
Postbiotic approach to antibiotic resistance: antibacterial and antibiofilm potential of Lactobacillus salivarius supernatant.
Article in International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid rise in antibiotic resistance is making infections, particularly those caused by ESBL-positive and biofilm-forming Escherichia coli isolates, increasingly difficult to treat. Therefore, interest in alternative biotherapeutic approaches based on probiotic or postbiotic sources is increasing. Although there are many reports on the antibacterial and antibiofilm effects of probiotics in the current literature, the efficacy of Lactobacillus salivarius supernatant (LS-S) on ESBL-positive and biofilm-forming clinical E. coli isolates has not been studied sufficiently. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial and antibiofilm effects of LS-S against ESBL-positive E. coli isolates in vitro and to compare it with other probiotic-derived findings in the literature. Antibacterial activity was determined by modified disk diffusion and agar well diffusion methods, and growth inhibition was assessed over time using a microplate assay. Biofilm inhibition was measured using a quantitative biofilm assay, and the results were analyzed statistically. LS-S produced average inhibition zones of 16.0 ± 3.9 mm (disk) and 18.8 ± 3.3 mm (well) in ESBL-positive E. coli isolates. Microplate assay results showed that inhibition reached 20% at 3 h, 65–70% at 6–12 h, and 87% at 24 h. In biofilm analyses, biofilm formation was suppressed in all isolates, with inhibition exceeding 40% detected in 13 isolates (43.3%), and the highest efficacy was found to be 73.1%. The data obtained demonstrate that LS-S has the capacity to inhibit both planktonic growth and biofilm development. These findings demonstrate that postbiotic-based biotherapeutics are promising candidates for infection control in the era of antibiotic resistance and highlight the need for in vivo and translational studies for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.