ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2026
Acoustic Flutter Processing in the Inferior Colliculus of Awake Marmosets: Complementary Rate Coding Modulated by Acoustic Parameters.
Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The acoustic flutter is processed through complementary monotonic rate coding and cannot be modulated by other acoustic parameters in the auditory cortex (AC). However, it remains unclear how the inferior colliculus (IC) encodes acoustic flutter, especially when changing other acoustic parameters. Here, we recorded IC neural activity in response to acoustic flutter and determined the existence of conjunctive processing between repetition rate and other acoustic parameters. We found that most IC neurons also encode the repetition rate at the flutter range through complementary monotonic rate coding. In addition, although the acoustic parameters did not change their monotonicity, most IC neurons encode both repetition rate and other acoustic parameters, different from the flutter processing in AC. Thus, complementary monotonic rate coding for acoustic flutter was widespread in the auditory system; however, coding specificity for repetition rate increased from IC to AC, and the capacity for conjunctive coding with other acoustic parameters decreased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.