ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
A scoping review of frameworks that guide race and ethnicity data collection in health settings: Learnings for the Canadian health setting.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDisparities in health outcomes exist among racial and ethnic minorities in Canada. However, no detailed and representative population-level data document these disparities, except for Indigenous populations. We aimed to identify frameworks for collecting race and ethnicity data in health settings and synthesize data collection practices to guide healthcare leaders on how practices could be standardized within the Canadian health system.
methodsUsing a scoping review method, we identified primary studies, review articles, and grey literature that include frameworks or other recommendations on race and ethnicity data collection and extracted data about their characteristics, context, attributes, and components. We summarized the data using frequencies and descriptions. SYNTHESIS: We identified 23 frameworks from the United States (n = 14) and Canada (n = 9). While 18 frameworks have been used in hospitals, health centers, public health units, and a clinical trial, five were developed as recommendations. Only few framework developers involved various stakeholder groups and used paper and electronic methods to collect race and ethnicity information from patients. All frameworks from the USA share a similar reference point for race and ethnicity categories, unlike those from Canada.
conclusionThese findings provide a foundation for race and ethnicity data collection practices. Data collection can begin by engaging relevant stakeholders to develop or adapt an existing framework collaboratively. The goal should be to standardize collection practices, ensuring that racial and ethnic classifications can be aggregated to a national scale for decision-making for improved health outcomes for all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41806083What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.