ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Glioblastoma survival in rural America: a 10-year experience from a quaternary care center.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neurooncology: 2026 update.Free neuropathology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with dismal prognosis. Patients residing in rural and Appalachian regions encounter multiple barriers to timely diagnosis and access to multidisciplinary neuro-oncology care, but whether these barriers translate into worse survival remains uncertain. West Virginia (WV), a predominantly rural Appalachian state, is served by a primary academic medical center (WV University Ruby Memorial Hospital) with a dedicated neuro-oncology program. We performed a retrospective analysis of the electronic health record to characterize overall survival and prognostic factors among WV residents diagnosed with GBM.
methodsRetrospective cohort of 380 adults (≥ 18 years) with pathologically confirmed Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-wildtype (IDH-WT) GBM (2015-2025). Rurality defined by ZIP-code RUCA. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between overall survival (OS) and age, sex, treatment, rurality, and O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status.
resultsMedian OS was 12.7 months. Age ≥ 65 was associated with worse survival (15.9 vs. 9.1 months; p < 0.001). Rural and non-rural survival was equivalent (12.5 vs. 12.7 months; p = 0.87). Temozolomide (TMZ) use significantly improved OS (14.0 vs. 6.2 months; p < 0.001). Gross total resection and MGMT promoter methylation were both associated with significantly improved overall survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.0005, respectively).
conclusionsIn a predominantly rural state served by a primary academic neuro-oncology program, median overall survival for GBM was 12.7 months indicating centralized care eliminates rural-urban survival gaps in GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.