SynthesisCurrent environmental health reports2026
Oil and Gas Development and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Qualitative and Quantitative Bias Analysis of the Epidemiologic Literature.
Synthesis in Current environmental health reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Residential proximity to oil and gas development and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewA growing body of literature examines links between oil and gas development and adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, these studies may be vulnerable to common sources of bias in perinatal epidemiology. We extend a prior systematic review with a joint qualitative and quantitative bias analysis. RECENT
findingsAcross 18 studies, the most commonly evaluated outcomes were low birth weight (78%), preterm birth (72%), and small-for-gestational-age (56%). Qualitative bias analysis showed that the vast majority of studies had evidence of fixed cohort and live birth biases, respectively. Quantitative bias analysis estimating the potential magnitude and direction of bias due to unmeasured confounding by socioeconomic status suggested little influence under our assumptions. This review highlights important sources of bias that should be considered when interpreting findings related to the relationship between oil and gas development and birth outcomes. We provide recommendations for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41806058What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.