ArticlePsychological research2026
Coarser event segmentation and impaired temporal order memory in subclinical ADHD.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We segment a naturalistic, narrative stimulus based on our perception of contextual boundaries. People differ in how they perceive event boundaries, affecting their segmentation and subsequent recall of the temporal structure of the events. Understanding individual difference factors that affect boundary processing will provide further insight in how individuals segment and memorize a naturalistic stimulus. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a condition that is characterized by altered or impaired temporal attentional allocation. It would follow that participants with a high ADHD predisposition are more likely to miss boundaries and thereby segment a narrative stimulus differently than participants with low ADHD scores. However, it is not known if temporal memory varies with ADHD scores. We report an online study (N = 71) in which we tested boundary reporting and temporal order memory performance of a 22-minute sitcom episode in a sample of healthy volunteers that individually varied in self-reported ADHD scores. Results showed a negative correlation between self-reported ADHD scores and number of reported event boundaries, i.e., participants with higher ADHD scores reported fewer boundaries. Further, participants with higher ADHD scores performed more poorly than lower scoring participants for the temporal order of scene frames crossing a boundary, but not for frames presented in the same scene. These findings can be explained by models of impaired dynamic attentional allocation in ADHD. We discuss our findings in light of current literature and suggest that segmentation of naturalistic stimuli is a potentially powerful way of studying cognition and memory in ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.