ArticlePloS one2026
Computational fluid dynamics analysis of middle ear pressure dynamics: Evidence for efficient pressure equalization during partial eustachian tube opening.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEustachian tube (ET) dysfunction is associated with middle ear pathologies; however, the quantitative relationship between ET opening and pressure equalization remains insufficiently characterized. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) offers a robust tool for analyzing middle ear pressure dynamics, particularly in elucidating pressure equilibrium mechanisms under partial ET opening conditions.
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate pressure dynamics in the tympanic cavity, mastoid antrum, and air cells during ET opening using CFD, to compare pressure distributions between full and partial openings, and to determine whether partial opening can achieve equilibration equivalent to full opening.
methodsEight normal temporal bones were reconstructed from high-resolution computed tomography scans of four healthy adults. ET openings were simulated at 10%, 30%, 50%, and 100% patency using CFD, and results were validated against in vivo Tubomanometry data. Pressure variations in the tympanic cavity, mastoid antrum, and air cells were monitored throughout the process. Mesh independence was verified to ensure reliability, and statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 27.0, with P < 0.05 considered significant.
resultsCFD simulations revealed distinct pressure dynamics within the ET-middle ear system. Airflow velocity peaked at the narrow isthmus, generating a localized pressure drop. Effective middle ear pressure equilibration-across the tympanic cavity, antrum, and mastoid air cells-was achieved with partial ET opening in most cases: 30% opening sufficed for full equilibration in two ears, while 50% opening achieved complete equilibration in six. This equivalence to full patency was consistently observed during pressurization, stabilization, and depressurization phases.
conclusionEffective middle ear pressure equilibration can be achieved with partial ET opening (50%) in most cases (75% of ears). These findings provide valuable insight into middle ear physiology and its response under pathological conditions, offering a theoretical basis for optimizing the management of ET dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.