ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Simple and sensitive cellulose paper-based microextraction of 25 steroid esters from human serum/plasma for doping control purposes.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood is increasingly used as a biological matrix in the doping control field; however, the limited volume typically available for analysis poses a significant challenge, particularly when multiple tests must be carried out on the same sample. This study proposes a simple and efficient microextraction protocol based on the use of unmodified cellulose for the extraction of 25 steroid esters from just 20 µL of serum or plasma. Sample preparation consisted of spotting 20 µL of serum or plasma on a cellulose card, followed by a double extraction of the target analytes with 500 µL of methanol and subsequent derivatization using Girard's Reagent P. The analysis was carried out using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. The analytical workflow was qualitatively validated according to the UNI CEI EN ISO/IEC 17025 standard and the WADA technical rules and notes in terms of selectivity (target analytes were distinguishable from the matrix interferences), sensitivity (limits of detection in the range of 0.05-0.70 ng/mL), carry-over (no signals were detected in the negative sample injected after the positive sample), intra and inter-day stability of the retention times (≤0.5%), matrix effect (13-32%), extract stability (the target analytes were stable for at least 72 h in the autosampler at 10 °C), and extraction yield (43-88%). Plasma samples collected after testosterone undecanoate injection were finally analyzed: the compound was detectable in all three volunteers evaluated for at least 1 month after administration, demonstrating the effectiveness of the newly developed method for doping control purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41805898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.