Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2026
Prognostic Factors of Transvaginal Repair for Vesicovaginal Fistulas: A 5-Year Single-Center Study.
Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisVesicovaginal fistula (VVF) causes significant physical and psychosocial morbidity. Transvaginal repair, although generally safer than the abdominal route, lacks guideline-defined predictors of surgical success. However, recent trials have suggested that certain factors may influence surgical success.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted in a single-center hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia, between January 2020 and December 2024. Fistulas were classified using the Goh and Waaldijk systems. Data on patient demographics were collected preoperatively, and data on surgical success were collected during the 3-month follow-up period. Early repair refers to surgical intervention performed within the first 4 weeks. Univariate associations were assessed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and relative risk (RR). Independent predictors of surgical success were evaluated using Firth logistic regression, with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsThe mean age was 42.7 years; 65% had obstetric-related fistulas. Overall, 68 patients (85%) achieved successful repair. Early repair (<4 weeks) had higher success than delayed repair (94.4% vs. 77.3%; p = 0.032, RR ≈ 1.22). Small fistula size (<3 cm) and minimal fibrosis were also associated with higher success rates (89.7% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.005, RR ≈ 1.54; 88.6% vs. 60%, p = 0.018, RR ≈ 1.48). Firth logistic regression confirmed that late repair (OR 0.007, 95% CI 0.00002-0.16, p < 0.001), large fistula size (OR 0.0819, 95% CI 0.019-0.32, p < 0.001), and severe fibrosis (OR 0.0014, 95% CI 0.000004-0.032, p < 0.001) independently reduced the odds of repair.
conclusionsEarly intervention, small fistula size, and minimal fibrosis are independent predictors of successful transvaginal VVF repair. Preoperative evaluation of these factors can guide surgical planning and patient counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41805873What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.