ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2026
[Plasma proteomics in age-related macular degeneration].
Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) shows a heterogeneous treatment response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Classical approaches focus on single biomarkers, whereas the multifactorial and systemic nature of the disease has received less attention.
methodIn the BIOMAC cohort blood proteomes of patients with nAMD were systematically analyzed. Mass spectrometry, dimensionality reduction and pattern-based classifiers were applied to capture systemic proteomic signatures and link them to clinical phenotypes. As a supplement metabolomic analyses were carried out including a focus on xenobiotics.
resultsThe findings demonstrate a distinct yet complex influence of systemic signals: a subset of patients was characterized by oxidative stress and respiratory patterns independent of the ocular morphology. Individual proteins such as aldolase C were associated with disease control but lacked predictive power when considered alone. Only high-dimensional patterns of many proteins enabled a significant, although not yet perfect separation between effectively controlled and chronically active courses of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Metabolomic profiling further identified unexpected candidates, such as the sweetener saccharin, which consistently showed protective effects in both patients and experimental models.
conclusionSystemic plasma proteome and metabolome signatures reflect the clinical phenotype of nAMD. Modern statistical methods supported by artificial intelligence are the key to unravelling these complex datasets. Although no valid single biomarker has yet emerged, the pattern-based approach provides novel translational insights and can potentially broaden the therapeutic target space for nAMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41805864What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.