Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41805821›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Effectiveness of adding inspiratory muscle training to a cardiac rehabilitation program in people with acute myocardial infarction revascularized by percutaneous coronary intervention (CARDIOINSPIRE): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Jose M Zuazagoitia-Lama-Noriega, A M Gómez-González, Jose A Moral-Munoz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06681740 (CARDIOINSPIRE - Effectiveness of Adding Inspiratory Muscle Training to a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for People With Ischemic Heart Disease Revascularized by Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06681740 narecruitingnot on this map

CARDIOINSPIRE - Effectiveness of Adding Inspiratory Muscle Training to a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for People With Ischemic Heart Disease Revascularized by Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CadizRan2024 to 2026Enrolled72ConditionsMyocardial Ischemia, Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)ArmsInspiratory muscle training, Sham Inspiratory muscle training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jose M Zuazagoitia-Lama-NoriegaDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4191-4446
A M Gómez-GonzálezRehabilitation Department, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Malaga, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2824-0527
Jose A Moral-MunozDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6465-982X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to analyze the effectiveness of adding inspiratory muscle training (IMT) to a cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP) in people with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) revascularized by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after 16 sessions. The biopsychosocial profile and the sex differences of this population will also be evaluated.

designTriple-blind, parallel-group, low-risk randomized controlled trial.

methods72 patients diagnosed with AMI will be enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups. The control group will complete the usual CRP with the addition of IMT at 5% of the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) (sham load). The intervention group will perform the same CRP but will add an IMT program at 70% of MIP. Outcomes will be collected at baseline and post-intervention. The main outcome will be cardiorespiratory fitness (CF) measured in metabolic equivalent of task (MET), secondary outcomes will be MIP, maximal expiratory pressure, peripheral muscle strength, dyspnea, social support, anxiety, depression, coping with the disease, sexual dysfunction, quality of life (QoL), sleep quality, eating habits, and body composition. Descriptive statistics will summarize baseline data, and influential outliers will be managed via winsorization or exclusion, confirmed by sensitivity analyses. A mixed-design ANOVA will evaluate differential changes over time. Depending on attrition rates, missing data will be addressed using either complete case analysis (<5%) or multiple imputation with an intention-to-treat approach (>5%). DISCUSSION: According to recent literature, improvements in CF and MIP are expected. For the rest of the outcomes, data are currently limited, inconclusive or lacking. We hypothesize that changes in CF may affect the rest of the outcomes and, in our opinion, IMT at 70% of the MIP will significantly improve CF. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: If the expected benefits are observed, the results may recommend including IMT as a fundamental component of a CRP in our study population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered prospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06681740) Version 4.

Indexed as

Breathing ExercisesCardiac RehabilitationMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRespiratory MusclesAdultAgedCardiorespiratory FitnessFemaleHumansInhalationMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41805821
PMCPMC12974859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.