ArticlePloS one2026
Effectiveness of adding inspiratory muscle training to a cardiac rehabilitation program in people with acute myocardial infarction revascularized by percutaneous coronary intervention (CARDIOINSPIRE): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06681740 (CARDIOINSPIRE - Effectiveness of Adding Inspiratory Muscle Training to a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for People With Ischemic Heart Disease Revascularized by Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CARDIOINSPIRE - Effectiveness of Adding Inspiratory Muscle Training to a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for People With Ischemic Heart Disease Revascularized by Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to analyze the effectiveness of adding inspiratory muscle training (IMT) to a cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP) in people with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) revascularized by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after 16 sessions. The biopsychosocial profile and the sex differences of this population will also be evaluated.
designTriple-blind, parallel-group, low-risk randomized controlled trial.
methods72 patients diagnosed with AMI will be enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups. The control group will complete the usual CRP with the addition of IMT at 5% of the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) (sham load). The intervention group will perform the same CRP but will add an IMT program at 70% of MIP. Outcomes will be collected at baseline and post-intervention. The main outcome will be cardiorespiratory fitness (CF) measured in metabolic equivalent of task (MET), secondary outcomes will be MIP, maximal expiratory pressure, peripheral muscle strength, dyspnea, social support, anxiety, depression, coping with the disease, sexual dysfunction, quality of life (QoL), sleep quality, eating habits, and body composition. Descriptive statistics will summarize baseline data, and influential outliers will be managed via winsorization or exclusion, confirmed by sensitivity analyses. A mixed-design ANOVA will evaluate differential changes over time. Depending on attrition rates, missing data will be addressed using either complete case analysis (<5%) or multiple imputation with an intention-to-treat approach (>5%). DISCUSSION: According to recent literature, improvements in CF and MIP are expected. For the rest of the outcomes, data are currently limited, inconclusive or lacking. We hypothesize that changes in CF may affect the rest of the outcomes and, in our opinion, IMT at 70% of the MIP will significantly improve CF. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: If the expected benefits are observed, the results may recommend including IMT as a fundamental component of a CRP in our study population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered prospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06681740) Version 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.