Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41805787›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Strategies for updating rules driven by reinforcement learning to solve social dilemmas.

Yang Wang, Xingchen Yu, Shounan Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yang WangSchool of Information and Control Engineering, North China Institute of Science and Technology, Langfang, Hebei, China.
Xingchen YuSchool of Information and Control Engineering, North China Institute of Science and Technology, Langfang, Hebei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-5041
Shounan LuSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Laboratory of Mathematics and Complex Systems, MOE, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-3570

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study incorporates historical performance into traditional imitation rules and proposes a moderated strategy update rule. In this framework, an individual's temporal historical performance is calculated using the BM model. By adjusting the parameter δ, the influence of historical performance on strategy learning is determined, and the evolution of cooperation is subsequently observed. Results show that the proposed strategy update rule promotes cooperation more effectively than the traditional version, and systemic cooperation is further enhanced as δ increases. The reason why the proposed rule enhances cooperation is that it amplifies the evaluation of cooperative behavior while compressing the evaluation of defective behavior. Although establishing system objectives may hinder the diffusion of cooperative behavior, appropriate performance evaluation mechanisms can mitigate this adverse effect. Our results indicate that multidimensional evaluation can provide a theoretical basis for explaining cooperative behavior in complex environments.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorLearningHumansReinforcement Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID41805787
PMCPMC12974810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.