Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41805755›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A pruned and parameter-efficient Xception framework for skin cancer classification.

Şafak Kılıç, Yahya Doğan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Şafak KılıçSchool of Computer Science, CHART Laboratory, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2014-7638
Yahya DoğanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1529-6118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer is one of the most prevalent and potentially lethal diseases worldwide, with early detection being critical for patient survival. This study presents a novel framework that leverages transfer learning, pruning, SMOTE, data augmentation, and the advanced Avg-TopK pooling method to improve the accuracy and efficiency of skin cancer classification using dermoscopic images. The HAM10000 dataset was used to evaluate the performance of various transfer learning models, with Xception as the top performer. A layer-based pruning strategy was proposed to optimize the model and reduce its complexity. SMOTE and data augmentation were applied to address the class imbalance within the dataset, significantly improving the model's generalization across all skin lesion classes. The utilization of the Avg-TopK pooling technique further enhanced model accuracy by preserving crucial image features during the downsampling process. The proposed approach achieved an overall accuracy of 91.52%, surpassing several state-of-the-art models. Following pruning, the model's parameter count was reduced by approximately 35%, from 20.9 million to 13.5 million, improving efficiency and performance. This framework demonstrates the effectiveness of combining model pruning, oversampling, and advanced pooling methods to build robust and efficient skin cancer classification systems suitable for clinical applications.

Indexed as

DermoscopySkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsHumansTransfer Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID41805755
PMCPMC12974828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.