ArticlePloS one2026
A pruned and parameter-efficient Xception framework for skin cancer classification.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid Decision-Level Fusion of CNN-Based Deep and Handcrafted Features for Colon Cancer Classification.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin cancer is one of the most prevalent and potentially lethal diseases worldwide, with early detection being critical for patient survival. This study presents a novel framework that leverages transfer learning, pruning, SMOTE, data augmentation, and the advanced Avg-TopK pooling method to improve the accuracy and efficiency of skin cancer classification using dermoscopic images. The HAM10000 dataset was used to evaluate the performance of various transfer learning models, with Xception as the top performer. A layer-based pruning strategy was proposed to optimize the model and reduce its complexity. SMOTE and data augmentation were applied to address the class imbalance within the dataset, significantly improving the model's generalization across all skin lesion classes. The utilization of the Avg-TopK pooling technique further enhanced model accuracy by preserving crucial image features during the downsampling process. The proposed approach achieved an overall accuracy of 91.52%, surpassing several state-of-the-art models. Following pruning, the model's parameter count was reduced by approximately 35%, from 20.9 million to 13.5 million, improving efficiency and performance. This framework demonstrates the effectiveness of combining model pruning, oversampling, and advanced pooling methods to build robust and efficient skin cancer classification systems suitable for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.