Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41805706›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Investment modeling for scalable agricultural learning.

Norman Peter Reeves, Rebecca Pietrelli, Ian Brooks, Victor G Sal Y Rosas Celi, Kumpati Narendra, Jean C Ngabitsinze, Maximo Torero Cullen, Anne N Lutomia, John W Medendorp, Julia M Bello-Bravo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Norman Peter ReevesSumaq Life LLC, Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Rebecca PietrelliFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Ian BrooksCenter for Health Informatics, University of Illinois, Illinois, United States of America.
Victor G Sal Y Rosas CeliSección de Matemáticas, Departamento de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Perú.
Kumpati NarendraDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Jean C NgabitsinzeUniversity of Rwanda, College of Agriculture, Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Rwanda.
Maximo Torero CullenFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Anne N LutomiaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences Education and Communication, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
John W MedendorpThe Urban Center, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Julia M Bello-BravoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences Education and Communication, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Barry R PittendrighThe Urban Center, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7784-0257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rise of information and communication technologies, localized farmer training can be transformed into scalable strategies applicable across diverse communities, cultures, and languages. However, the economic value of these approaches and the factors shaping their returns remain underexplored. This study presents a general framework for evaluating the economic impact of scalable agricultural learning initiatives, using multilingual instructional animations and YouTube dissemination as a case study. Systems modeling was used to simulate potential returns, assess key drivers of impact, and estimate the number of farmers required for economic viability. Sensitivity analysis shows that returns are most influenced by the cost to inform an individual, adoption rates, and income gains, and to a lesser degree, technique-sharing rates and adoption costs. When existing educational content is adapted and its lifespan extended, learning initiatives can be economically viable with few targeted farmers, making the linguistic adaption into minority or rarer languages an economically viable option. The wide variation in returns across scenarios highlights the importance of tailoring models to specific contexts to obtain more precise estimates of economic impact. These findings underscore the value of adaptable and durable learning materials and suggest that future research-for-development (R4D) investments could benefit from systems modeling to identify and prioritize high-impact agricultural solutions.

Indexed as

AgricultureFarmersInvestmentsLearningHumansModels, Economic

Identifiers

PMID41805706
PMCPMC12974861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.