ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2026
The dual effects of individual and contextual factors on adolescent problematic internet use: Machine learning approaches and SHAP explanations.
Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Associations Between Problematic Internet Use and Future Time Perspective Among Adolescents: A Two-Wave Cross-Lagged Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validation of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) for forest firefighters: implications for human-technology interaction and occupational safety in the future of work.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study applied the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model and the Relational Development System Theory (RDS) to identify key individual and contextual correlates of adolescents' problematic Internet use (PIU) with machine learning approaches. Methods: Data from 68,425 adolescents were analyzed using five ensemble models (AdaBoost, Random Forest, LightGBM, Bagging, CatBoost) within a nested cross-validation framework. Key factors were identified through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), while bivariate partial dependence analyses were used to identify interactions. Results: The prevalence of PIU risk was 23.2%. Five algorithms achieved comparable performance. CatBoost achieved the best performance and was selected as the final predictive model. SHAP values showed that the top 17 features explained nearly 80% of the model. At the individual level, intolerance of uncertainty was the strongest risk factor, whereas mindfulness was the main protective factor. Additionally, weekend video game time was a major behavioral risk contributor. At the contextual level, home-leaving intentions and bullying perpetration were identified as key family- and peer-related risk factors, respectively. Bivariate partial dependence analyses found both within-individual (e.g., mindfulness * intolerance of uncertainty) and individual-contextual (e.g., mindfulness * home-leaving intentions) interaction effects. Conclusions: This study applied five machine learning algorithms to identify key individual and contextual factors associated with adolescent PIU risk and their interactions. The results suggest that risk factors accumulate across systems and impair adolescents' adaptive capacity, whereas mindfulness exerts cross-system effects that buffer these risks, offering implications for targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.