ArticleClinical nuclear medicine2026
18 F-FDG Outperforms 18 F-FAPI-04 in Detecting Primary Splenic Angiosarcoma and Its Metastatic Lesions in Liver.
Article in Clinical nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A few case reports show FAPI PET may be superior to FDG PET in evaluating angiosarcoma. We describe FDG PET/CT, delayed abdominal FDG PET/MRI, and 18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT findings in a case of primary splenic angiosarcoma with diffuse hepatic metastases. In this case, FDG PET was superior to FAPI PET in evaluating the primary and metastatic tumors. FDG PET showed much higher activity in the primary splenic tumors compared with 18 F-FAPI-04 PET. FDG PET identified the hepatic metastases due to increased activity, which was missed on 18 F-FAPI-04 PET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.