Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41805238›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026

Parents' perceived safety, usability, and acceptability of vaccination through microarray patches: A preliminary multi-national cross-sectional survey.

Matthew N Berger, Erin Mathieu, Cristyn Davies, Ramon Z Shaban, Shopna Bag, S Rachel Skinner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew N BergerSpecialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3720-6681
Erin MathieuSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5209-7989
Cristyn DaviesSpecialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1506-3285
Ramon Z ShabanSydney Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5203-0557
Shopna BagCentre for Population Health, Western Sydney Local Health District, North Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6987-3764
S Rachel SkinnerSpecialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1970-9792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microarray patches (MAPs) are an emerging, needle-free vaccination technology with potential to improve vaccine uptake and acceptability. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted to assess parents' perceptions of MAP safety, usability, and acceptability for themselves and their children. Participants were parents of children aged ≤18 y residing in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, or New Zealand. Responses were recorded on a 7-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests were used for analysis. A total of 102 parents participated (mean age = 40.7 y, SD = 10.6), predominantly from Canada (59.8%) and Australia (35.3%). Parents rated MAP vaccination as safe and effective (mean = 5.13; 95% CI: 4.83-5.43), easy to use (mean = 5.51; 95% CI: 5.26-5.77), and acceptable (mean = 5.43; 95% CI: 5.18-5.68). Respondents preferred MAPs over traditional needle and syringe (N&S) methods for themselves and their children, particularly citing benefits for those with needle-related anxiety. Parents expressed stronger preferences for healthcare provider administration for children compared to themselves. MAP self-administration was also viewed positively. Participants indicated greater willingness to pay more for their child to receive the MAP vaccination compared to themselves. Findings suggest that parents perceive MAPs as a safe, usable, and acceptable alternative to N&S vaccination for themselves and their children.

Indexed as

ParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationAdolescentAdultAustraliaCanadaChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinesacceptabilityimmunizationmicroarray patchParentsusabilityvaccination

Identifiers

PMID41805238
PMCPMC12977274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.