Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41805125›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2026

Cruciform-forming AT/TA repeats are acted upon by structure-selective endonucleases and Rad51 prior to repositioning to the nuclear periphery for repair.

Jan Leendert Boer, Sara M Crippen, Amelia J Kim, Daphne N Kramer, Bertrand Theulot, Daniel Dovrat, Amir Aharoni, Duncan J Smith, Catherine H Freudenreich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jan Leendert BoerDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-5221-2534
Sara M CrippenDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, United States.
Amelia J KimDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, United States.
Daphne N KramerDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10012, United States.
Bertrand TheulotDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10012, United States.
Daniel DovratDepartment of Life Sciences and the National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva 8410501, Israel.
Amir AharoniDepartment of Life Sciences and the National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva 8410501, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2701-6996
Duncan J SmithDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10012, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0898-8629
Catherine H FreudenreichDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1652-2917

Funding

Mapping transient interactions with and on genomic DNAR35GM134918 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Duncan J Smith · 2020 to 2026
$4.2M
Replication through DNA Structures and Consequences for Genome StabilityR35GM144215 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI CATHERINE H FREUDENREICH · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
Binational Science Foundation 2021737Binational Science Foundation 2023164Binational Science Foundation 548574498Binational Science Foundation 552129721Israeli Science Foundation 707/21NIH HHS R35GM134918NIH HHS R35GM144215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structure-forming DNA repeats can pose a barrier to DNA replication and repair, creating chromosomal fragile sites. An AT/TA DNA repeat, derived from the Flex1 region of human common fragile site FRA16D, can form hairpin and cruciform structures, which interfere with DNA replication. When inserted into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome, the Flex1(AT)34 repeat stimulates chromosome deletions in a manner dependent on the Mus81-Mms4 nuclease and the SLX4 nuclease scaffold. It was previously found that hairpin-forming CAG/CTG repeats move to the nuclear periphery to maintain genomic stability. Here, we show that a structure-forming AT/TA repeat also relocalizes to the nuclear periphery in late S/G2 phase in a replication- and length-dependent manner. In contrast to the CAG repeat, this shift in nuclear positioning is dependent on polySUMOylation and the activity of the Mus81-Mms4 nuclease. Processing by the Mre11 nuclease and Rad51-dependent strand exchange occurs prior to repositioning. Replication analysis indicates that the replisome likely bypasses the AT/TA repeat, leaving behind a DNA structure that initiates relocation to the nuclear periphery. We conclude that AT/TA repeats form post-replicative DNA structures that are targeted for nuclease cleavage and require hairpin processing and repositioning to the nuclear periphery for homologous recombination-dependent repair.

Indexed as

DNA, CruciformDNA RepairEndonucleasesRad51 RecombinaseSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCell NucleusDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA ReplicationEndodeoxyribonucleasesExodeoxyribonucleasesFlap EndonucleasesHumansMRE11 Homologue ProteinSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, CruciformEndodeoxyribonucleasesEndonucleasesExodeoxyribonucleasesFlap EndonucleasesMMS4 protein, S cerevisiaeMRE11 Homologue ProteinMRE11 protein, S cerevisiaeMUS81 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD51 protein, S cerevisiaeRad51 RecombinaseSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41805125
PMCPMC12972899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.