ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Cruciform-forming AT/TA repeats are acted upon by structure-selective endonucleases and Rad51 prior to repositioning to the nuclear periphery for repair.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of the nuclear pore complex in the stability of disease-related short tandem DNA repeats.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Overcoming natural replication barriers formed by DNA structures and the role of repositioning to the nuclear periphery.DNA repair · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structure-forming DNA repeats can pose a barrier to DNA replication and repair, creating chromosomal fragile sites. An AT/TA DNA repeat, derived from the Flex1 region of human common fragile site FRA16D, can form hairpin and cruciform structures, which interfere with DNA replication. When inserted into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome, the Flex1(AT)34 repeat stimulates chromosome deletions in a manner dependent on the Mus81-Mms4 nuclease and the SLX4 nuclease scaffold. It was previously found that hairpin-forming CAG/CTG repeats move to the nuclear periphery to maintain genomic stability. Here, we show that a structure-forming AT/TA repeat also relocalizes to the nuclear periphery in late S/G2 phase in a replication- and length-dependent manner. In contrast to the CAG repeat, this shift in nuclear positioning is dependent on polySUMOylation and the activity of the Mus81-Mms4 nuclease. Processing by the Mre11 nuclease and Rad51-dependent strand exchange occurs prior to repositioning. Replication analysis indicates that the replisome likely bypasses the AT/TA repeat, leaving behind a DNA structure that initiates relocation to the nuclear periphery. We conclude that AT/TA repeats form post-replicative DNA structures that are targeted for nuclease cleavage and require hairpin processing and repositioning to the nuclear periphery for homologous recombination-dependent repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.