ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Sensory Experience and Motor Signals Shape Auditory Processing in an Independent Manner.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensory Experience and Motor Signals Shape Auditory Processing in an Independent Manner.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voluntary actions are usually accompanied by sensory consequences that evoke neural responses in relevant sensory regions. These responses are different when compared to those evoked by otherwise identical physical stimulation not associated with preceding actions (sensory attenuation). A common model suggests that sensory attenuation is caused by efference signals associated with the binding of actions with sensory outcomes. Nevertheless, the information encoded in such signals is debated, with some theories suggesting they convey predictive information while others suggest they convey global motor information regardless of outcome expectations. To address this debate, we recorded EEG data, while participants (n = 30) learned to associate motor or visual cues with corresponding tones. Following eight cue-outcome presentations, participants successfully learned the association (> 84% correct). At the neural level, the amplitude of auditory-evoked responses (N100) decreased during learning, as experience with cues and tones was gained. In addition, N100 amplitude was attenuated when preceded by motor vs. visual cues (sensory attenuation). Most importantly, we did not find an interaction effect between learning phase and cue type, suggesting a similar magnitude of sensory attenuation throughout learning. Moreover, we find significant sensory attenuation even before tone-specific expectations were formed. Thus, our results suggest that the magnitude of sensory attenuation is invariant to short-term experience with specific action-outcome contingency. Exploratory time-frequency analysis suggests experience affects EEG signals prior to tone onset and earlier than motor signals. Together, our results are consistent with models suggesting a distinct influence of action on sensory processing that is independent of experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.