ArticleAsian journal of andrology2026
Outcomes following varicocele treatment: a comparative study of microsurgical and angioembolization approaches.
Article in Asian journal of andrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of microsurgical varicocelectomy (MV) versus percutaneous angioembolization (AE) in men with varicoceles causing infertility or scrotal pain. Endpoints included postoperative changes in semen parameters, complication rates, pain relief, need for additional interventions, and the influence of body mass index (BMI). We retrospectively reviewed 264 male patients treated for varicocele from July 2015 to July 2024 (MV: 214 patients, and AE: 50 patients). Only patients older than 18 years were included. Indications were infertility or chronic varicocele-related scrotal pain. Pre- and post-treatment semen analyses were compared in infertile men, and pain outcomes were assessed in those treated for pain. Complications and secondary interventions were recorded, and outcomes were stratified by BMI. MV significantly improved sperm concentration, motility, and total motile count within 3-6 months, while AE showed no significant change. Complications occurred only in the MV group (8.9%), including hydrocele, hematoma, and surgical site infection, while no complications were reported in the AE group. Persistent pain was observed in one-third of patients in both groups, and AE was associated with a higher rate of secondary intervention (14.0%) compared to MV (6.6%). BMI was not linked to complications or operative time but was associated with poorer baseline semen quality. Within 3-6 months post-treatment, varicocelectomy yielded greater improvement in semen quality, while AE offered a favorable safety profile but less reproductive benefit and a higher retreatment rate. Both approaches were safe across BMI categories, though longer-term studies are needed to clarify patient selection and delayed outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.