Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41804912›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2026

Anomaly Detection for Structural and Functional Connectivity in Glioma Patients.

Maria Colpo, Ryan Pollitt, Alexander Leemans, Diego Cecchin, Maurizio Corbetta, Alessandra Bertoldo, Alberto De Luca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria ColpoPadova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Ryan PollittImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Alexander LeemansImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Diego CecchinPadova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Maurizio CorbettaPadova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Alessandra BertoldoPadova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Alberto De LucaImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2553-7299

Funding

Fondazione Ing. Aldo Gini ScholarshipGalen and Hilary Weston FoundationMinistry of University and Research (MUR), National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), project MNESYS PE0000006Starting Grant from the European Research Council 101163214Stichting Hanarth Fonds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain connectivity, quantified with diffusion MRI (structural connectivity, SC) and resting-state functional MRI (functional connectivity, FC), can offer crucial insights into glioma-brain network interactions. Currently, no standardized approach exists to integrate information from FC and SC and to identify potential tumor-induced abnormalities at the single-patient level. Variational autoencoders (VAEs) have been shown to be promising for learning the distribution of features representing a healthy brain and deviations thereof and can naturally be applicable to multiple modalities. This study explores the potential of VAE to integrate FC and SC and detect multimodal anomalies in brain connectivity in glioma patients. The VAE is trained on concatenated FC-SC healthy data to learn how to reconstruct normative connectivity patterns. After ad hoc transfer learning, the model parameters are applied to the oncological dataset, to obtain the healthy version of the pathological matrices. Given the healthy, pathological, and reconstructed matrices, a statistic is developed with the goal of identifying specific alterations in SC, FC, and their FC + SC integration in glioma patients. SC, FC, and FC + SC abnormalities are compared with each other to explore their interplay and their link with tumor and surrounding brain tissues. Results show that FC is more sensitive to alterations distant from the tumor, while SC is more affected in its vicinity. Then, the alterations identified by FC are generally more in agreement with the alterations identified by FC + SC compared with those highlighted by SC. Moreover, SC abnormalities never overlap with FC + SC out of the tumor, and FC and SC single impairments partially overlap within the tumor core and never overlie in other brain tissues. This information could facilitate patient stratification, prognostic modeling, and personalized treatment planning.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAutoencoderBrainFemaleHumansMaleanomaly detectionbrain tumorfunctional connectivitygliomaintegrationsingle subjectstructural connectivityvariational autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID41804912
PMCPMC12973340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.