Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41804872›Full record

ReviewGenetics2026

Modeling diseases of aging in larval zebrafish, a paradoxical yet powerful strategy.

Güliz Gürel Özcan, Jason Rihel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Güliz Gürel ÖzcanDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0519-8733
Jason RihelDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4067-2066

Funding

Alzheimer's ResearchWellcome TrustWellcome Trust Investigator Award #217150/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases are a set of devastating medical conditions in which neuronal loss associated with the aggregation of toxic proteins leads to progressive cognitive impairment. These diseases are usually modeled in animals by mimicking late disease stages through genetic modifications that aggressively accumulate proteins that damage the brain. However, these diseases typically unfold over decades, and disease-associated genes are known to have important, but understudied, biological functions in early life stages. To address this research gap, we suggest that the larval zebrafish, which has conserved orthologs of most neurodegeneration-linked genes, is an excellent model to examine early mechanisms that set the stage for disease progression, such as altered neuronal function, synaptic re-wiring, and proteostasis. We propose a systematic genetic modeling and phenotyping pipeline in zebrafish that integrates CRISPR editing, high-throughput behavioral assays, brain-wide activity mapping, and pharmacological screens to capture neurodegenerative disease-related changes that occur well before clinical disease emerges. Studying diseases of aging in larval zebrafish may sound paradoxical; however, by uncovering cellular dysfunction at the earliest stages of disease in a living vertebrate brain, this approach could identify critical therapeutic targets at timepoints before degeneration becomes irreversible.

Indexed as

AgingDisease Models, AnimalNeurodegenerative DiseasesZebrafishAnimalsBrainHumansLarvaALSAlzheimer's diseasebehavioral fingerprintingbehavioral pharmacologybrain-wide activity mappinggenetic disease modelingneurodegenerationParkinson's diseasezebrafish

Identifiers

PMID41804872
PMCPMC13050203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.