Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41804811›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2026

Diagnostic Yield of Tongue Swab- Compared to Sputum-Based Molecular Testing for Tuberculosis in Four High-Burden Countries.

Caitlin A Moe, Rita Kabuleta Luswata, Armen Jheannie Barrameda, Hien Le, Seke Muzazu, Rebecca Crowder, Alfred O Andama, Claudia M Denkinger, Monde Muyoyeta, Ha Phan and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diagnostic Accuracy and Usability of the PluslifeDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of a Rapid Automated Point-of-Care Test formedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Caitlin A MoeDivision of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9318-2514
Rita Kabuleta LuswataWorld Alliance for Lung and Intensive Care Medicine in Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Armen Jheannie BarramedaCenter for Tuberculosis Research, De la Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute, Cavite, Philippines.
Hien LeCenter for Promotion of Advancement of Society, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-3131-4080
Seke MuzazuTB Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0003-0101-8416
Rebecca CrowderCenter for Tuberculosis, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California SanFrancisco, San Francisco, California,USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6374-3088
Alfred O AndamaWorld Alliance for Lung and Intensive Care Medicine in Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-0526-0007
Claudia M DenkingerDepartment of Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Monde MuyoyetaTB Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0003-3609-5403
Ha PhanCenter for Promotion of Advancement of Society, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-4510-0473
Adithya CattamanchiDivision of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6553-2601
Charles YuCenter for Tuberculosis Research, De la Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute, Cavite, Philippines.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTongue swabs are a promising alternative specimen for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis. Although test specificity exceeds 98%, sensitivity is lower than sputum-based molecular testing. We investigated whether the use of tongue swabs could increase sample availability, resulting in similar diagnostic yield.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study (July 2024-January 2025), we screened consecutive people with presumptive TB at health centers in the Philippines, Vietnam, Uganda, and Zambia. Participants were asked to provide tongue swabs and referred for routine sputum collection. Tongue swabs were tested in research laboratories using the MiniDock MTB Test (Guangzhou Pluslife Biotech Co., Ltd., China); sputum was tested using WHO-recommended molecular testing per national guidelines. We compared diagnostic yield, defined as proportion of positive test results among all participants, between tongue swab- and sputum-based molecular testing with a prespecified 3.0% non-inferiority margin.

resultsOf 1639 participants, 851 (51.9%) were female, 415 (25.3%) were diagnosed with HIV, and 132 (8.1%) were children <5 years. All provided tongue swabs, but only 1389 (84.7%) produced sputum. Diagnostic yield was 3.8% (63/1639) for tongue swabs and 4.1% (68/1639) for sputum-based (68/1639, 4.1%) molecular testing. The difference (0.3%, 95% CI -0.6 to +1.2) was within the prespecified non-inferiority margin. Results were consistent across countries and key subgroups (age, sex, and HIV status).

conclusionsTongue swab-based molecular testing with MiniDock MTB achieved non-inferior diagnostic yield compared with sputum-based molecular testing. These findings support scale-up of swab-based platforms as a cost-efficient alternative, particularly where sputum collection is challenging or smear microscopy remains the primary diagnostic method.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesSpecimen HandlingSputumTongueTuberculosisAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisPhilippinesdiagnostic yieldscreening & diagnosticstuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID41804811
PMCPMC13131914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.