Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41804773›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2026

Liquid Biofuels for Transportation: Lessons of the Last Two Decades for the Next Two.

Deepak Rajagopal, Gal Hochman, Shruti K Mishra, Umakant Mishra, Sabrina Spatari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deepak RajagopalInstitute of the Environment and Sustainability and Department of Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2237-7979
Gal HochmanDepartment of Agricultural & Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Shruti K MishraEarth, Water & Energy Systems, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California 94551, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0437-9057
Umakant MishraBiomaterials & Biomanufacturing, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California 94551, United States.
Sabrina SpatariFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Grand Technion Energy Program and The Resnick Sustainability Center for Catalysis, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7243-9993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofuel mandates and subsidies in several countries led to a 5-fold global growth in ethanol and biodiesel from edible crops in the last two and a half decades. The impacts of this growth for the economy and environment are uncertain and vary with feedstock, production practices, time horizon for impacts, policy parameters, and assumptions inherent to lifecycle assessments and economic modeling. In this context, we offer a perspective on the path forward given that many of the reasons that motivated existing biofuel policies remain relevant. Given advances in batteries and to a lesser extent in green hydrogen, biofuels appear more effective in reducing emissions in applications such as aviation and ocean freight. However, overcoming the lingering technological and economic barriers facing advanced biofuels will require better policies. Both economic intuition and empirical evidence suggest that more targeted approaches can better accelerate innovation and commercialization from waste biomass and dedicated energy crops. Lifecycle-emissions-based performance standards (such as California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard), incentives for emissions reductions and ecosystem services from farming, and policies that minimize regulatory uncertainties (such as relaxation or waiver of annual targets) may lead to technological breakthroughs and adoption of practices that make biofuels more sustainable.

Indexed as

BiofuelsTransportationBiofuelsbiofuelsfood-fuel trade-offindirect effectslife-cycle analysis (LCA)mandates

Identifiers

PMID41804773
PMCPMC13019691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.