Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41804683›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2026

Diagnostic reassessment in patients previously diagnosed with childhood-onset epilepsy during the transition to adult care: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary epilepsy center.

Tetsuhiro Fukuyama, Masaru Nasuno, Manami Yabe, Makoto Nishioka, Yumi Hoshino, Takenori Natsume, Kohei Kanaya, Kyoko Takano, Tomoki Kaneko, Yushi Inoue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tetsuhiro FukuyamaDepartment of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4786-9486
Masaru NasunoDepartment of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1317-1699
Manami YabeDepartment of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Makoto NishiokaDepartment of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Yumi HoshinoDepartment of Neurology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Takenori NatsumeDepartment of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1716-9489
Kohei KanayaEpilepsy Center of Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9667-9828
Kyoko TakanoCenter for Medical Genetics, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7283-1503
Tomoki KanekoDepartment of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Yushi InoueNational Epilepsy Center, NHO Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7654-036X

Funding

MHLW Research Program on Rare and Intractable Diseases JPMH23FC0201MHLW Research Program on Rare and Intractable Diseases JPMH24FC1008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the frequency, predictors, and clinical implications of diagnostic reassessment in patients previously diagnosed with childhood-onset epilepsy during the transition period to adult care at a tertiary epilepsy center.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 317 patients previously diagnosed with childhood-onset epilepsy who underwent diagnostic reassessment between April 2018 and December 2023 at age 16 years or older at a tertiary epilepsy center in Japan. Diagnostic revision was defined as a newly established or corrected epilepsy/epilepsy syndrome diagnosis, identification of structural or genetic/metabolic etiologies, or diagnosis of non-epileptic conditions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of diagnostic revision.

resultsA new or revised diagnosis was established in 60 of the 317 patients (18.9%). Independent predictors of diagnostic revision included exclusively non-motor seizures (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 7.610; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.660-21.767; p < 0.001) and weekly or monthly seizure frequency (aOR = 3.370; 95% CI: 1.265-8.976; p = 0.015), whereas prior visits to other epilepsy centers were strongly protective (aOR = 0.047; 95% CI: 0.015-0.146; p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Newly identified etiologies include focal cortical dysplasia, hippocampal sclerosis, and pathogenic genetic variants such as CDKL5, PCDH19, and SYNGAP1. Diagnostic reassessment facilitated antiseizure medication withdrawal in patients with self-limited epilepsy and non-epileptic events. SIGNIFICANCE: Nearly one in five patients previously diagnosed with childhood-onset epilepsy required diagnostic revision during the transition to adult care. Non-motor seizure semiology and moderate seizure frequency were the major predictors of diagnostic revision, highlighting the diagnostic uncertainty associated with subtle clinical presentations. These findings highlight that systematic reassessment, especially for individuals who have not previously undergone specialized epilepsy center evaluation, is essential for achieving an accurate diagnosis and optimizing management in adulthood. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Many people diagnosed with epilepsy in childhood continue medical care into adulthood, but their diagnosis may need to be reviewed later in life. In this study, nearly one in five patients who had been diagnosed with childhood-onset epilepsy required a change or refinement of their diagnosis when reassessed after age 16. Patients with seizures without clear physical movements and those whose seizures occurred weekly or monthly were more likely to need diagnostic review. These findings highlight the importance of reviewing the diagnosis during adolescence, especially for patients who have not previously been evaluated at specialized epilepsy centers.

Indexed as

EpilepsyTransition to Adult CareAdolescentAdultAge of OnsetFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersYoung Adultchildhood‐onset epilepsydiagnostic reassessmentnon‐motor seizurestertiary epilepsy centertransition to adult care

Identifiers

PMID41804683
PMCPMC13238796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.