SynthesisContact dermatitis2026
Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Isothiazolinones in Dermatitis Patients From 2000 to 2025: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Contact dermatitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contact Sensitisation Trends in Slovenian Children and Adolescents: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.Contact dermatitis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Isothiazolinones are employed in the preservation of cosmetic, consumer and industrial products, with the objective of preventing deterioration and spoilage. However, the utilization of isothiazolinones is associated with an elevated risk of developing contact allergy (CA). Herein, we assess the epidemiology of CA to isothiazolinones among dermatitis patients from year 2000 onwards. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from 1 January 2000 to 19 April 2025 yielding 115 studies comprising 1 514 781 dermatitis patients. The prevalence of CA to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) was 4.58%, methylisothiazolinone (MI) was 5.48%, and benzisothiazolinone (BIT) was 2.09%. The clinical relevance ranged from 60.1% for MCI/MI, 55.6% for MI, and 35.3% for BIT. Asia and North and South America exhibited the highest rates of CA to isothiazolinones, whereas Europe showed lower rates. These findings underscore the efficacy of proactive risk management for post-marketed substances such as MI, underscoring substantial regional variations in usage patterns, which are contingent on the strictness or permissiveness of their incorporation into everyday consumer products. There is an indication of a decline, particularly regarding MI and MCI/MI. However, there has been an increase in the use of substances such as BIT, which necessitates enhanced surveillance measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.