Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41804565›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of older people nursing2026

Exploring Staff Perspectives on the Feasibility of Integrating the Environmental Components of a Novel Intervention for Hydration in Long-Term Care.

Sophia Werden Abrams, Safura Syed, Ashwini Namasivayam-MacDonald, Raksha Aravind, Kristina Devlin, Wen Liu, Christina Lengyel, Phyllis Gaspar, Janet Mentes, Susan E Slaughter and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of older people nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sophia Werden AbramsMcMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0699-0610
Safura SyedUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Ashwini Namasivayam-MacDonaldMcMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9473-8844
Raksha AravindUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Kristina DevlinUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9092-712X
Wen LiuThe Pennsylvania State University Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christina LengyelUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Phyllis GasparIndependent Consultant, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5244-5330
Janet MentesUCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Susan E SlaughterUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Minn N YoonUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Heather KellerUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7782-8103

Funding

Aramark
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term care (LTC) residents are prone to dehydration, which has many serious effects on health. A multicomponent intervention is required to mitigate dehydration in LTC; however, previous research has not explored the experiences of staff who deliver interventions. The purpose of this study was to explore staff perspectives on the feasibility of implementing the environmental components of a novel multicomponent hydration intervention.

methodsThe intervention was enacted over 4 weeks on an urban LTC unit in Ontario, Canada. The components were large drinking glasses (300 mL) and a purpose-built beverage trolley. Observations of workflow by research assistants were conducted throughout the intervention. Personal support staff participated in post-intervention semi-structured interviews, framed using the Behaviour Change Wheel, to determine the perceived factors influencing implementation. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to generate qualitative themes from interview transcripts.

resultsEight staff members participated in post-intervention interviews. Ages ranged from 20 to 49 years, with 1-25 years of experience in LTC. While some minor improvements were suggested, staff were accepting of the environmental strategies and integrated them into the workflow consistently. Four major themes were generated via qualitative analysis and categorised using the Behaviour Change Wheel: (1) optimising efficiency (physical opportunity, reflective motivation), (2) adapting to change (reflective motivation and social opportunity), (3) knowing the resident (reflective motivation, psychological capability) and (4) supporting hydration (physical opportunity, psychological capability, reflective motivation). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of this study indicate that LTC staff perceive the environmental components of a novel hydration intervention to be feasible and useful in supporting resident hydration.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDehydrationAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedNursing HomesOntarioYoung Adultdehydrationdehydration prevention protocolenvironmental interventionenvironmental modificationgeriatric carehydrationlong‐term caremulticomponent intervention

Identifiers

PMID41804565
PMCPMC12972859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.