ArticlePeerJ2026
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Candidemia is a major global public health problem due to the high mortality rates and increasing antifungal resistance. This study investigated the epidemiology and risk factors of candidemia in eastern China over the past 10 years. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2015 to December 2024 in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University to investigate the possible routes and risk factors of candidemia. Antifungal susceptibility was determined using broth microdilution method. Results: The incidence of candidemia increased from 0.98% to 1.69% over the past 10 years. In total 276 candidemia cases, Conclusions: The incidence of candidemia has increased in recent years, with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.