Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41804464›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Unveiling Protist Composition and Diversity Patterns With eDNA Metabarcoding: Comparing Short- and Long-Read Approaches.

Dimitra-Ioli Skouroliakou, Deborah W E Dupont, Yelle Vandenboer, Sofie D'Hont, Koen Sabbe, Isa Schön

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dimitra-Ioli SkouroliakouIFREMER, DYNECO Plouzané France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0325-4754
Deborah W E DupontOperational Directorate Natural Environment, Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecology, Freshwater Biology Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3112-8245
Yelle VandenboerOperational Directorate Natural Environment, Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecology, Freshwater Biology Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-5109
Sofie D'HontIFREMER, DYNECO Plouzané France.
Koen SabbeIFREMER, DYNECO Plouzané France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5163-5581
Isa SchönOperational Directorate Natural Environment, Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecology, Freshwater Biology Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9269-6487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a key tool in biodiversity monitoring due to its high-throughput, non-destructive nature. While short-read (SR) sequencing platforms such as Illumina Miseq have been routinely used in environmental monitoring, their limited read lengths (less than 600 bp) constrain the depth of taxonomic assignment, particularly for complex microbial eukaryotes like protists. Conversely, long-read (LR) sequencing technologies like Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offer promising alternatives but remain underutilized for studying protist communities. We conducted a comparative study of SR versus LR metabarcoding of protist communities along a coastal-offshore gradient in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Using amplicons targeting the V4 region (SR; 577 bp) and the V4-V5 region (LR; 745 bp) of the 18S rRNA gene, we compared diversity patterns, taxonomic assignment, and community composition between approaches. We observed general congruence in community composition at higher taxonomic levels, but under the applied workflows, LR metabarcoding yielded a greater depth of taxonomic annotation at lower taxonomic ranks. Notably, dinoflagellates were less overrepresented in LR data, and a unique detection of potential nuisance taxa (e.g.,

Identifiers

PMID41804464
PMCPMC12967641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.