ArticleCureus2026
Laparoscopic Management of Jejunal Perforation Caused by Toothpick Ingestion: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foreign body ingestion is a frequent clinical problem, although most ingested objects pass spontaneously through the gastrointestinal tract. Sharp and elongated foreign bodies, such as toothpicks, are associated with a higher risk of perforation and may present diagnostic challenges due to their radiolucent nature. We report the case of a 62-year-old man who presented with a four-day history of abdominal pain, fever, nausea, and signs of peritoneal irritation. Laboratory tests revealed leukocytosis and elevated inflammatory markers. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography demonstrated a linear foreign body approximately 4 cm in length, oriented perpendicular to the jejunal axis, with focal bowel wall thickening and adjacent mesenteric inflammation, consistent with small-bowel perforation. Urgent diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. Intraoperatively, minimal inflammatory fluid and localized fibrinopurulent plaques were observed. Two small jejunal perforations were identified, one of which contained a protruding wooden toothpick. The foreign body was removed laparoscopically, and primary enterorrhaphy was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful, with early return of bowel function and no infectious or surgical complications. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 4 and remained asymptomatic at follow-up. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for gastrointestinal perforation following the ingestion of sharp foreign bodies. Computed tomography plays a central role in diagnosis, and in selected stable patients, laparoscopy provides a safe and effective approach for definitive management, allowing diagnosis, foreign body extraction, and bowel repair in a single minimally invasive procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.