Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41804433›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

False Localizing Signs in High Lumbar Stenosis: L2/3 Compression Mimicking L5 Radiculopathy.

Mikhail De Santos, Marnie Leach

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mikhail De SantosNeurosurgery/Spine Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, GBR.
Marnie LeachNeurosurgery/Spine Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis typically manifests with symptoms that correlate precisely to the anatomical level of compression. However, 'false localising signs' do exist, which can lead to diagnostic conundrums. A foot drop is classically attributed to a pathology at the L4/5 level affecting the L5 nerve root; however, it may rarely result from more proximal lumbar compressive pathologies. We report a rare case of high lumbar stenosis (L2/3) manifesting with typical and atypical symptoms, highlighting the importance of sound clinical decision-making while recognising this confounding clinical entity. A 55-year-old man presented with chronic back pain, neurogenic claudication, and a right-sided foot drop (Medical Research Council grade 1/5). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine revealed severe stenosis at the L2/3 level but no significant compression at the L4/5 or L5/S1 levels. Interestingly, neurophysiological studies confirmed L5 radiculopathy. The patient subsequently underwent an L2/3 decompression for neurogenic claudication. Post-operatively, the patient reported improvement in claudication and complete resolution of the foot drop, which remained stable at 12 months' follow-up. This case highlights that high lumbar lesions can mimic distal lumbosacral radiculopathy. This case emphasises that the level of the clinical deficit does not always correlate with the level of compression, leading to false localising signs. It is hypothesised that the L5 nerve root is particularly vulnerable at the L2/3 level due to its peripheral position within the thecal sac as it descends the cauda equina. Clinicians should be aware of this phenomenon to avoid unnecessary or incorrect surgical targeting and to aid in counselling and expectation setting.

Indexed as

electromyographic (emg)emg-ncvfalse localising signsfoot drophigh lumbar stenosislumbar spinal stenosis (lss)minimal invasive spine surgerymotor radiculopathynerve conduction velocity (ncv)surgery spine

Identifiers

PMID41804433
PMCPMC12967792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.