ReviewCureus2026
3D Printing Techniques for Dental Prosthetic Models: A Narrative Review and Contemporary Perspectives.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over time, the methods for creating dental models have expanded significantly. Nowadays, digital technology and computers in medicine offer more options beyond plaster casts made using the traditional method. The advancement of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems provides a broad array of technologies, including both subtractive and additive techniques. The main purpose of this paper is to present the various modern three-dimensional printing systems concerning the fabrication of dental models and subsequently compare them both with each other and with the traditional technique of plaster model fabrication. A description of the main methods of additive manufacturing (AM; also referred to as 3D printing) for dental models is provided, along with bibliographic data regarding their accuracy and effectiveness, as well as comparisons with traditional manufacturing methods. The results of this paper indicate that stereolithography (SLA), digital light processing (DLP), and PolyJet technologies are the most precise choices for producing full arch dental models for prosthodontic use, offering high levels of trueness. Using digital tools and software, AM creates desired casts layer by layer, streamlining the production of complex, customized dental models with high speed, accuracy, and lower costs. The clinical significance of 3D-printed dental models is multifaceted, offering improvements in accuracy, efficiency, communication, education, cost-effectiveness, and innovation in dental practice. These technological advancements contribute to providing higher-quality care and better outcomes for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.