Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41804422›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Social Media and Adolescent Mental Health: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Vinod Sharma, Aditi Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vinod SharmaPsychiatry, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, USA.
Aditi SharmaPsychiatry, The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media use is nearly universal among adolescents and has become a prominent focus of concern regarding its potential impact on mental health. The aim of this narrative review is to synthesize and critically evaluate the evidence on the relationship between social media use and adolescent mental health, with particular attention to risk pathways, protective factors, underlying mechanisms, moderating variables, and intervention strategies. Existing research suggests that social media may function as both a risk factor and a source of support, depending on patterns of use, individual vulnerability, and contextual influences. A narrative review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO to identify peer-reviewed articles published between 2007 and 2025. Search terms included social media, adolescents, mental health, depression, anxiety, sleep, cyberbullying, body image, problematic use, and digital interventions. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, longitudinal studies, experimental trials, and high-quality observational studies were prioritized, and findings were synthesized thematically. Social media influences adolescent mental health through multiple risk and protective pathways, with modest individual-level effects but meaningful population-level relevance due to widespread use during a sensitive developmental period. Outcomes are shaped by psychological mechanisms, moderating factors, and patterns of engagement, while emerging multilevel interventions show promise in reducing harm and enhancing benefits. Overall, social media is not inherently harmful to adolescent mental health; rather, its impact depends on how, why, and in what context it is used, underscoring the need for nuanced, developmentally informed, and multilevel approaches.

Indexed as

adolescentsanxietybody imagedepressiondigital literacymental healthpeer supportsocial media

Identifiers

PMID41804422
PMCPMC12967810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.